Skip to content

Dynoxide on

dynoxide.dev github.com/nubo-db/dynoxide

0.9.13 as measured in this run

Grade A
low divergence
answers 2.1% of the suite differently from real DynamoDB
100.0% covered
Tier 1 · Core 2.2% diverges
100.0% covered
7 of 314 attempted
Tier 2 · Complete 0.0% diverges
100.0% covered
Tier 3 · Strict 2.9% diverges
100.0% covered
6 of 208 attempted

When this run was published the board led with a single correctness percentage. The figures here are that run's own results restated as divergence and coverage, so they read differently from what this page showed at the time. The changelog has the change.

How it got here

Dynoxide's history up to this run, ending on the figures above. Both are plotted because neither reads correctly alone: divergence falls when a target stops attempting an operation it used to get wrong, so a fall in the first plot is only an improvement if the second one holds. The target's own page carries the full history.

Divergence

Dynoxide divergence up to 2026-05-24 0% 2% 4% divergence - lower is better 23 Mar 24 Apr 25 Apr 27 Apr 23 May 24 May 2.1%
Diverging on 2.1% of the suite as of 24 May. Lower is better, so a falling line is a target getting closer to real DynamoDB.

Coverage

Dynoxide coverage up to 2026-05-24 98% 99% 100% coverage - higher is better 23 Mar 24 Apr 25 Apr 27 Apr 23 May 24 May 100.0%
Implementing 100.0% of the suite as of 24 May. Higher is better. This is the share of the suite's tests a target implements at all. A fail becoming a skip leaves both numerators over the same fixed denominator, so a fall here is matched point for point by a fall in divergence: withdrawal costs exactly as much coverage as it gains divergence.

Where it fell short on this date

The tests this run recorded as failing, each linked to its source at the commit that measured it. For the current picture, see this target's latest results, or every target in this run.