Skip to content

ExtendDB (SQLite) on

github.com/ExtendDB/extenddb

v0.1.13 as measured in this run

Grade C
moderate divergence · coverage lowers this row to C
answers 10.7% of the suite differently from real DynamoDB
73.4% covered · 446 unsupported
Tier 1 · Core 0.0% diverges
100.0% covered
Tier 2 · Complete 4.2% diverges
37.6% covered 282 unsupported
19 of 170 attempted
Tier 3 · Strict 22.1% diverges
77.5% covered 164 unsupported
161 of 565 attempted

How it got here

ExtendDB (SQLite)'s history up to this run, ending on the figures above. Both are plotted because neither reads correctly alone: divergence falls when a target stops attempting an operation it used to get wrong, so a fall in the first plot is only an improvement if the second one holds. The target's own page carries the full history.

Divergence

ExtendDB (SQLite) divergence up to 2026-10-22 0% 8% 15% divergence - lower is better 15 Aug 17 Aug 18 Aug 21 Aug 23 Aug 25 Aug 30 Aug 3 Sep 13 Sep 20 Sep 29 Sep 9 Oct 11 Oct 18 Oct 22 Oct 10.7%
Diverging on 10.7% of the suite as of 22 Oct. Lower is better, so a falling line is a target getting closer to real DynamoDB.

Coverage

ExtendDB (SQLite) coverage up to 2026-10-22 70% 85% 100% coverage - higher is better 15 Aug 17 Aug 18 Aug 21 Aug 23 Aug 25 Aug 30 Aug 3 Sep 13 Sep 20 Sep 29 Sep 9 Oct 11 Oct 18 Oct 22 Oct 73.4%
Implementing 73.4% of the suite as of 22 Oct. Higher is better. This is the share of the suite's tests a target implements at all. A fail becoming a skip leaves both numerators over the same fixed denominator, so a fall here is matched point for point by a fall in divergence: withdrawal costs exactly as much coverage as it gains divergence.

Where it fell short on this date

The tests this run recorded as failing, each linked to its source at the commit that measured it. For the current picture, see this target's latest results, or every target in this run.