Skip to content

Floci on

e0b292df4dc9 as measured in this run

Grade B
moderate divergence
answers 14.4% of the suite differently from real DynamoDB
99.6% covered · 7 unsupported
Tier 1 · Core 0.2% diverges
100.0% covered
1 of 497 attempted
Tier 2 · Complete 6.2% diverges
98.5% covered 7 unsupported
28 of 445 attempted
Tier 3 · Strict 29.2% diverges
100.0% covered
213 of 729 attempted

How it got here

Floci's history up to this run, ending on the figures above. Both are plotted because neither reads correctly alone: divergence falls when a target stops attempting an operation it used to get wrong, so a fall in the first plot is only an improvement if the second one holds. The target's own page carries the full history.

Divergence

Floci divergence up to 2026-10-25 0% 20% 40% divergence - lower is better 27 Apr 26 May 18 Jun 23 Jun 30 Jun 13 Jul 17 Jul 22 Jul 29 Jul 13 Aug 21 Aug 3 Sep 9 Oct 25 Oct 14.4%
Diverging on 14.4% of the suite as of 25 Oct, at worst 37.1% on 27 Apr. Lower is better, so a falling line is a target getting closer to real DynamoDB.

Coverage

Floci coverage up to 2026-10-25 92% 96% 100% coverage - higher is better 27 Apr 26 May 18 Jun 23 Jun 30 Jun 13 Jul 17 Jul 22 Jul 29 Jul 13 Aug 21 Aug 3 Sep 9 Oct 25 Oct 99.6%
Implementing 99.6% of the suite as of 25 Oct, as little as 95.0% on 21 Aug. Higher is better. This is the share of the suite's tests a target implements at all. A fail becoming a skip leaves both numerators over the same fixed denominator, so a fall here is matched point for point by a fall in divergence: withdrawal costs exactly as much coverage as it gains divergence.

Where it fell short on this date

The tests this run recorded as failing, each linked to its source at the commit that measured it. For the current picture, see this target's latest results, or every target in this run.