Run
7 emulators 699 tests
Results as of this run. The arrow shows each target's movement since the previous run it was tested in.
What changed in the suite this run
Suite on
Real DynamoDB in eu-west-2 reworded a chunk of its validation errors, and the Tier 3 error-message tests moved with it. They now assert the contract the error carries - its type, the field it objects to, and the constraint - rather than the exact prose, because AWS varies the wrapper, the echoed input value and the field casing from one region to the next. A four-region capture in June found eu-west-2 and eu-central-1 on the new wording and us-east-1 and ap-southeast-2 still on the old, so the line between contract and cosmetic is drawn from what is invariant across all four.
This moves some Tier 3 numbers. Targets that were only ever marked down for wording DynamoDB itself renders inconsistently now pass those checks, so their Tier 3 scores rise: the suite has stopped counting a cosmetic difference as a behavioural one. Genuine behavioural divergences are still pinned exactly, for example PutItem with a { NULL: false } attribute, which DynamoDB now accepts in eu-west-2 and normalises to { NULL: true }.
-
live (AWS) · full coverage100% ground truthTier 1 100%Tier 2 100%Tier 3 100%
-
0.10.0 · 14 unsupported99.6% -0.4pp fell 0.4 percentage pointsTier 1 100.0%Tier 2 100.0%Tier 3 98.6%
-
v0.1.1 · 42 unsupported97.9% +4.1pp rose 4.1 percentage pointsTier 1 97.2%Tier 2 97.8%Tier 3 99.1%
-
176654570cf2 · full coverage97.4% +10.4pp rose 10.4 percentage pointsTier 1 98.3%Tier 2 93.9%Tier 3 98.1%
-
c88ec20bf221 · 9 unsupported92.6% 0.0pp unchangedTier 1 94.1%Tier 2 87.8%Tier 3 93.0%
-
2026.5.2 · 8 unsupported88.3% 0.0pp unchangedTier 1 98.6%Tier 2 92.7%Tier 3 68.7%
-
d89f8fcc6b1a · 13 unsupported87.0% 0.0pp unchangedTier 1 97.2%Tier 2 89.1%Tier 3 69.2%
-
4.0.0 · 67 unsupported82.1% -0.9pp fell 0.9 percentage pointsTier 1 95.5%Tier 2 16.9%Tier 3 79.9%