Run 2026-06-30

Grew to 824 tests, up 7, in two parts: two sibling-parity gaps where one half of a rule was pinned and the other was not, and the capacity accounting of conditional and idempotent transactional writes. All characterised against real DynamoDB in eu-west-2.

The first covers the LSI side of the INCLUDE-projection-without-NonKeyAttributes rejection; the GSI side already had it. An LSI declared with ProjectionType INCLUDE and no NonKeyAttributes is rejected as a ValidationException in tier1 and pinned to the exact message in tier3, the same wording the GSI case returns.

The second pins the Query message for Select SPECIFIC_ATTRIBUTES with no ProjectionExpression, which Scan already had. Query and Scan enforce the same rule but word it differently: Query wraps the phrase in the "1 validation error detected:" envelope, Scan returns it bare.

The transaction cases settle what a conditional TransactWriteItems actually costs. A passing condition adds no read capacity: a conditional write bills the same 2 WCU per sub-1KB item as an unconditional one, and a standalone ConditionCheck costs 2 WCU, billed as write not read. Idempotent replay splits the accounting - the first call reports 2 write capacity units, a same-token replay within the window reports 2 read capacity units for re-reading the stored result. A failing condition cancels the transaction, and the response carries no ConsumedCapacity at all. Answers #27.

Run 30 Jun 2026