Skip to content

Dynalite on

github.com/architect/dynalite

4.0.0 as measured in this run

Grade C
moderate divergence · coverage lowers this row to C
answers 12.3% of the suite differently from real DynamoDB
80.0% covered · 200 unsupported
Tier 1 · Core 8.6% diverges
100.0% covered
41 of 475 attempted
Tier 2 · Complete 14.1% diverges
20.1% covered 159 unsupported
28 of 40 attempted
Tier 3 · Strict 16.7% diverges
87.3% covered 41 unsupported
54 of 283 attempted

How it got here

Dynalite's history up to this run, ending on the figures above. Both are plotted because neither reads correctly alone: divergence falls when a target stops attempting an operation it used to get wrong, so a fall in the first plot is only an improvement if the second one holds. The target's own page carries the full history.

Divergence

Dynalite divergence up to 2026-08-12 0% 15% 30% divergence - lower is better 25 Apr 24 May 29 May 18 Jun 22 Jun 27 Jun 1 Jul 13 Jul 16 Jul 20 Jul 24 Jul 29 Jul 12 Aug 12.3%
Diverging on 12.3% of the suite as of 12 Aug, at worst 22.9% on 1 Jul. Lower is better, so a falling line is a target getting closer to real DynamoDB.

Coverage

Dynalite coverage up to 2026-08-12 75% 88% 100% coverage - higher is better 25 Apr 24 May 29 May 18 Jun 22 Jun 27 Jun 1 Jul 13 Jul 16 Jul 20 Jul 24 Jul 29 Jul 12 Aug 80.0%
Implementing 80.0% of the suite as of 12 Aug. Higher is better. This is the share of the suite's tests a target implements at all. A fail becoming a skip leaves both numerators over the same fixed denominator, so a fall here is matched point for point by a fall in divergence: withdrawal costs exactly as much coverage as it gains divergence.

Where it fell short on this date

The tests this run recorded as failing, each linked to its source at the commit that measured it. For the current picture, see this target's latest results, or every target in this run.