Skip to content

Run

4 emulators 572 tests

Results as of this run. The arrow shows each target's movement since the previous run it was tested in. The suite grew this run, so an upward arrow can be the new tests biting rather than a target getting worse.

When this run was published the board led with a single correctness percentage. The figures here are that run's own results restated as divergence and coverage, so they read differently from what this page showed at the time. The changelog has the change.

Suite grew from 526 to 572 tests this run.

That's 46 new tests measured against every target. Movement below compares to the previous run, so a rise here is as likely to be the stricter suite as a real regression.

What changed in the suite this run

Suite on

Grew to 572 tests, up 46 on the first run: thirty-six more in Tier 1 and ten more in Tier 2, deepening coverage of the core and complete-feature behaviour.

  1. live (AWS)

    Runs via: AWS service

    Grade baseline
    0.0%Divergence
    100.0%Coverage

    no divergence in all 33 regions

    ground truth
    Tier breakdown
    Tier 1 · Core 0.0% diverges
    100.0% covered
    Tier 2 · Complete 0.0% diverges
    100.0% covered
    Tier 3 · Strict 0.0% diverges
    100.0% covered
  2. -

    Runs via: npx, Docker, Homebrew, binary, npm, cargo, embedded, GitHub Action, source

    Maintained by the board’s author

    Grade A+
    0.0%Divergence
    100.0%Coverage
    unchanged
    Tier breakdown
    Tier 1 · Core 0.0% diverges
    100.0% covered
    Tier 2 · Complete 0.0% diverges
    100.0% covered
    Tier 3 · Strict 0.0% diverges
    100.0% covered
  3. -

    Runs via: Docker, pip, Homebrew, binary

    Grade B
    6.5%Divergence
    100.0%Coverage
    diverged 0.6 percentage points less
    Tier breakdown
    Tier 1 · Core 1.0% diverges
    100.0% covered
    Tier 2 · Complete 3.9% diverges
    100.0% covered
    Tier 3 · Strict 18.1% diverges
    100.0% covered
  4. -

    Runs via: Docker, JAR, Maven

    Grade B
    7.3%Divergence
    100.0%Coverage
    diverged 0.6 percentage points less
    Tier breakdown
    Tier 1 · Core 1.0% diverges
    100.0% covered
    Tier 2 · Complete 8.7% diverges
    100.0% covered
    Tier 3 · Strict 18.1% diverges
    100.0% covered
  5. Grade B
    11.7%Divergence
    92.5%Coverage
    diverged 0.9 percentage points more
    Tier breakdown
    Tier 1 · Core 1.7% diverges
    100.0% covered
    Tier 2 · Complete 48.5% diverges
    58.3% covered 43 unsupported
    Tier 3 · Strict 7.2% diverges
    100.0% covered