Run
4 emulators 572 tests
Results as of this run. The arrow shows each target's movement since the previous run it was tested in.
When this run was published the board led with a single correctness percentage. The figures here are that run's own results restated as divergence and coverage, so they read differently from what this page showed at the time. The changelog has the change.
-
Grade baselineground truth0.0%Divergence100.0%Coverage
no divergence in all 33 regions
Tier breakdown
Tier 1 · Core 0.0% diverges100.0% coveredTier 2 · Complete 0.0% diverges100.0% coveredTier 3 · Strict 0.0% diverges100.0% covered -
Grade Adiverged 1.0 percentage points more1.0%Divergence100.0%Coverage
Tier breakdown
Tier 1 · Core 0.0% diverges100.0% coveredTier 2 · Complete 0.0% diverges100.0% coveredTier 3 · Strict 3.6% diverges100.0% covered -
Grade Bdiverged 1.2 percentage points more7.7%Divergence100.0%Coverage
Tier breakdown
Tier 1 · Core 1.0% diverges100.0% coveredTier 2 · Complete 3.9% diverges100.0% coveredTier 3 · Strict 22.3% diverges100.0% covered -
Grade Bdiverged 1.2 percentage points more8.6%Divergence100.0%Coverage
Tier breakdown
Tier 1 · Core 1.0% diverges100.0% coveredTier 2 · Complete 8.7% diverges100.0% coveredTier 3 · Strict 22.3% diverges100.0% covered -
Grade Cdiverged 0.9 percentage points more12.6%Divergence92.5%Coverage
coverage lowers this row to C
Tier breakdown
Tier 1 · Core 1.7% diverges100.0% coveredTier 2 · Complete 48.5% diverges58.3% covered 43 unsupportedTier 3 · Strict 10.2% diverges100.0% covered