Run
6 emulators 601 tests
Results as of this run. The arrow shows each target's movement since the previous run it was tested in. The suite grew this run, so an upward arrow can be the new tests biting rather than a target getting worse.
When this run was published the board led with a single correctness percentage. The figures here are that run's own results restated as divergence and coverage, so they read differently from what this page showed at the time. The changelog has the change.
Suite grew from 572 to 601 tests this run.
That's 29 new tests measured against every target. Movement below compares to the previous run, so a rise here is as likely to be the stricter suite as a real regression.
What changed in the suite this run
Suite on
Grew to 601 tests, up 29, and every new test landed in Tier 3: a broader strict surface spanning validation ordering, exact error messages, service limits, and the legacy request shapes. Floci and Ministack were added to the run as targets the same day.
-
Grade baselineground truth
no divergence in all 33 regions · covers 100.0% of the suite
Tier breakdown
Tier 1 · Core 0.0% diverges100.0% coveredTier 2 · Complete 0.0% diverges100.0% coveredTier 3 · Strict 0.0% diverges100.0% covered -
-
Runs via: npx, Docker, Homebrew, binary, npm, cargo, embedded, GitHub Action, source
Disclosure: maintained by this board's author
Grade A+diverged 1.0 percentage points lessno divergence · covers 100.0% of the suite
Tier breakdown
Tier 1 · Core 0.0% diverges100.0% coveredTier 2 · Complete 0.0% diverges100.0% coveredTier 3 · Strict 0.0% diverges100.0% covered -
Grade Bdiverged 3.3 percentage points more
moderate divergence (11.0%) · covers 100.0% of the suite
Tier breakdown
Tier 1 · Core 1.0% diverges100.0% coveredTier 2 · Complete 3.9% diverges100.0% coveredTier 3 · Strict 30.3% diverges100.0% covered -
Grade Bdiverged 3.2 percentage points more
moderate divergence (11.8%) · covers 100.0% of the suite
Tier breakdown
Tier 1 · Core 1.0% diverges100.0% coveredTier 2 · Complete 8.7% diverges100.0% coveredTier 3 · Strict 30.3% diverges100.0% covered -
Grade Cdiverged 2.2 percentage points more
moderate divergence (14.8%) · covers 92.8% of the suite · coverage lowers this row to C
Tier breakdown
Tier 1 · Core 1.7% diverges100.0% coveredTier 2 · Complete 48.5% diverges58.3% covered 43 unsupportedTier 3 · Strict 17.4% diverges100.0% covered -
Grade Fnew
severe divergence (36.4%) · covers 97.0% of the suite
Tier breakdown
Tier 1 · Core 14.9% diverges100.0% coveredTier 2 · Complete 24.3% diverges82.5% covered 18 unsupportedTier 3 · Strict 76.4% diverges100.0% covered -
Grade Fnew
severe divergence (37.1%) · covers 95.8% of the suite
Tier breakdown
Tier 1 · Core 21.8% diverges100.0% coveredTier 2 · Complete 11.7% diverges75.7% covered 25 unsupportedTier 3 · Strict 74.4% diverges100.0% covered